Buy on Amazon
€57.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1494 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Phenom X4 9650 - 232 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€57.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €57.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1663 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
35.46944858420268%
Multi-Core
765
33.2753371030883%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Phenom X4 9650 or Core i7-3770
Battlefield 1, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
88 FPS
€8.83/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
