Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3659 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 23% better in F1 23 than Phenom X4 9650 - 160 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 54 vs 95 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
38.63636363636363%
Multi-Core
765
72.78782112274025%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
