Buy on Amazon
€47.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2714 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Phenom X4 9650 - 177 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
40.963855421686745%
Multi-Core
765
77.11693548387096%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
