Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 4492 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 54% better in Starfield than Phenom X4 9650 - 63 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€819.9
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €819.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.200477326968974%
Multi-Core
765
6.192827653201651%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |