Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 3302 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Phenom X4 9650 - 127 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
21.193232413178986%
Multi-Core
765
16.05119597146454%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Agena | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |