Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1902 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 4% better in Remnant II than Phenom X4 9650 - 79 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
| Agena | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
