Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 2714 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 157 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €133.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |