Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3444 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Phenom X4 9550 - 133 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
20.034246575342465%
Multi-Core
712
12.288574387297203%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Agena | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
