Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5355 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Escape From Tarkov than Phenom II X4 925 - 237 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 32 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
10.596026490066226%
Multi-Core
930
5.0903119868637114%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
