Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3813 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Alan Wake 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 116 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 20 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€736.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €736.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
20.304568527918782%
Multi-Core
930
9.92423433998506%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Deneb | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |