Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 5355 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Valheim than Phenom II X4 925 - 221 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
12.841091492776885%
Multi-Core
930
11.097852028639618%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
