Buy on Amazon
€35.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1665 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom II X4 925 - 109 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Celeron G1820 2,7GHz LGA1150 2MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
