Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 4089 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom II X4 925 - 110 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Ryzen 5 4600G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
20.330368487928844%
Multi-Core
930
15.178717153582506%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Deneb | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
