Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 2999 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Phenom II X4 925 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €75.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
29.170464904284408%
Multi-Core
930
29.458346531517265%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |