Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1492 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 4% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Phenom II X4 925 - 78 vs 75 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
58.82352941176471%
Multi-Core
930
42.83740211883924%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
| Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
