Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 3059 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Phenom II X4 810 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Deneb | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
