Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 2030 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than Phenom II X4 810 - 54 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Single-Core
293
25.25862068965517%
Multi-Core
876
16.0940657725519%
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Deneb | Codename | Haswell E |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
