Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1542 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
