Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9370 is 173 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1820 - 675 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 84% cheaper than FX-9370 - €35.49 vs €219.97
- Up to 85% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-9370 - €0.05 vs €0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
674
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |