Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €219.97 vs €621.92
- Up to 59% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.03 vs €2.49 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in Death Stranding than FX-9370 - 250 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 120 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2369 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
41%
Price, €
€621.92
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €621.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2369 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |