Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1360 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 32% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9370 - 321 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-9370 - €104.97 vs €219.97
- Up to 64% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9370 - €0.33 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
243
75.70093457943925%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
36.26373626373626%
Price, €
€219.97
47%
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50728 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
321
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €104.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |