Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1752 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - 178 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-8350 - €102.0 vs €155.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74416 minutes ago
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |