Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 587 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than FX-8320 - 697 vs 684 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
