Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900

FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900 Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz

Buy for 526.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76122 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900 Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz

Buy for 526.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76122 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3725 days newer than FX-8320.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - 147 vs 127 FPS
  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.
The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

127

86.39455782312925%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

147

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€526.97

100%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900 Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz

Buy for 526.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76122 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

459

16.912306558585115%

Multi-Core

1819

11.073907220260562%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

100%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

AMD FX-8320 Logo

AMD FX-8320

vs
Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameRaptor Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
24
8Threads
32
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.0 GHz
3.7 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz
125 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
10 nm
17.5xMultiplier
20.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using FX-8320 or Core i9-13900

The Last of Us Part I, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.