Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 344 days older than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8320 - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €546.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |