Buy on Amazon
€235.59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2746 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8320 - 210 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€235.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10500 Desktop-Prozessor (6 Kerne bis zu 4,5 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Serie) 65 W, Modellnummer: BX8070110500
Buy for €235.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using FX-8320 or Core i5-10500
Escape From Tarkov, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
107 FPS
€10.93/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-10500
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,169
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
