Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €73.57 vs €113.77
- Up to 27% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-11400 - €0.27 vs €0.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 12% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - 307 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16494 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
307
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
72%
Price, €
€113.77
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16494 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |