Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2084 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than FX-8150 - 201 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €522.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |