Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 2525 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 85% better in Diablo IV than FX-8150 - 170 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
