Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 330 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than Pentium G640 - 452 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
