Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3172 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 161 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €520.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |