Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 332 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G550 - 224 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
