Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2633 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 10% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-6350 - 496 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 128 vs 6 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 64 |
| 6 | Threads | 128 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
