Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1816 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - 168 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
