Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-6300 vs Core i3-2120

FX-6300 vs Core i3-2120: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-2120 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120 is 611 days older than FX-6300.

Advantages of AMD FX-6300

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 6 vs 4 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120

  • Performs up to 1% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-6300 - 189 vs 188 FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Escape From Tarkov.
Escape From Tarkov

Escape From Tarkov

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

188

99%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i3-2120 Logo
Core i3-2120

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011


FPS

189

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.33/FPS

100%

Price, €

€62.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Sockel 1155 Core i3 Processor i3-2120 Box Prozessor (3300MHz, L2/L3-Cache)

Buy for 62.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 180 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i3-2120 Logo
Core i3-2120

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

463

92%

Multi-Core

1453

100%

Intel Core i3-2120 Logo
Core i3-2120

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011


Single-Core

501

100%

Multi-Core

1035

71%

AMD FX-6300 Logo

AMD FX-6300

vs
Intel Core i3-2120 Logo

Intel Core i3-2120

Oct 23rd, 2012
Release DateFeb 20th, 2011
FXCollectionCore i3
VisheraCodenameSandy Bridge
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores2
6
Threads4
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.3 GHz
4.1 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
95 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size32 nm
17.5xMultiplier
33.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD 2000
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.