Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 4006 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 19% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6200 - 183 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 48 vs 6 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon W |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 3 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 48 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
