Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2985 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 27% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - 194 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |