Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2985 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield V than FX-6200 - 249 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €270.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |