Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700T outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700T is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700T
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 151 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i7-13700T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
