Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4003 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 31% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-6100 - 151 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €261.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |