Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3471 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6100 - 209 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Cezanne |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
