Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 and FX-6100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-6100 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
