Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3438 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 74% better in Rust than FX-4350 - 269 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 76394 minutes ago
Buy for €819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |