Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 841 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |