Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 43 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-4350 - 207 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
