Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 565 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than FX-4100 - 168 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 75953 minutes ago
Buy for €18.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |