Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1463 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 95 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-4300 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 44 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
