Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €29.22 vs €210.77
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11600K - €0.25 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4300 - 146 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14451 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
17%
Price, €
€210.77
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |