Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €29.22 vs €93.65
- Up to 66% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-10400F - €0.14 vs €0.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than FX-4300 - 227 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 374 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
34%
Price, €
€93.65
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €93.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |