Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2589 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 64 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
